Contact Us Today:
312.201.8310

LHF Productions Inc. - Help for Subpoenas and Summons

Received an LHF Productions Inc. Subpoena or Summons? We Can help!

Feeling confused or scared about receiving this letter and subpoena? Our FAQ page will answer these questions:

  • What is This About?
  • What Happens Next?
  • What Can I Do?
  • Stages in the Life of a "John Doe" Lawsuit - Alleged Movie Downloads

Many people are starting to receive copies of subpoenas from LHF Productions Inc. sent by their Internet service provider like Comcast or AT&T.

Call us at 312-201-8310 or 

click here for a free legal consultation

If you received an LHF Productions Inc. Subpoena or were served a Summons e best thing to do is to talk with an experienced lawyer.

  • Learn about what the notice means.
  • Do you want to quickly and anonymously make this go away by resolving the lawsuit by settling?
  • Or do you want to prepare to fight the lawsuit?
  • Should you file a motion to quash the subpoena?
  • Ask us every question that concerns you.

This is what clients say Antonelli Law is very good at:

  • Reducing your anxiety about the problem
  • Giving clear information to help you decide what to do
  • Responsive and accessible via phone and email
  • Tenacious and effective lawyers in lawsuit litigation

Antonelli Law has been defending clients accused of BitTorrent copyright claims since 2011 and Jeffrey Antonelli has been a civil litigator for over 15 years.  We've helped nearly 2,000 clients across the country deal with being targeted in federal copyright lawsuits.  See below for recent press on attorney Jeffrey Antonelli.

Our fees are reasonable and most cases are resolved out of court for a flat legal fee of $750 - $1,000 for anonymous settlements.


Don’t panic. Learn the facts and speak for free, confidentially, with our experienced attorneys.

Would you like information specific to your state? Click on the state you are interested in:


Antonelli Law's Nationwide Experience With BitTorrent Copyright Lawsuits

At Antonelli Law we have been defending people targeted in BitTorrent copyright infringement lawsuits like the one filed by LHF Productions Inc. for a long time and have helped nearly 2,000 clients nationwide. Attorney Jeffrey Antonelli has more than 15 years litigation experience and is admitted to the trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois federal court and our local counsel from the west coast to the east coast help us efficiently and effectively settle and fight lawsuits in your state



Call us at 312-201-8310 for a free initial attorney consultation or Click here for our simple contact form
. An attorney will respond to you shortly.

What is the LHF Productions Lawsuit About?

Usually your first notice about the LHF Productions Inc. lawsuit is a letter from your ISP such as AT&T, CenturyLink, Charter, Comcast, Cox, Time Warner, or Verizon and a subpoena. The letter notifies you that the ISP has been subpoenaed to release your name to the plaintiff. The letter often mentions your right to file in court a motion to quash or vacate the subpoena.

LHF Productions has filed lawsuits in Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Virginia, Utah, and Washington state.

LHF Productions, Inc.'s lawsuits allege illegal downloads of the movie “London Has Fallen” starring Gerard Butler, Morgan Freeman and Aaron Eckhart. The film plot involves an assassination plot to kill world leaders at the Prime Minister's funeral.

More than
1,500 John Doe defendants have been targeted so far. In Illinois the company is represented by the law firm Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. In Colorado, the company is represented by attorney David J. Stephenson, Jr.

What Happens After the Movie Company Receives My Name?

In the case of LHF Productions Inc., once your name is released you will probably receive a letter from the attorneys who represent LHF Productions Inc. offering a settlement although you could instead be immediately named in a lawsuit and served with a summons and complaint. Don't call them - you may incriminate yourself intentionally or unintentionally. Call us for a free attorney consultation.

For immediate advice and a free initial consultation call Antonelli Law at 312-201-8310, fill out our simple contact page or email us with a request to call you back at a time that is convenient for you. We understand the shock you may be feeling from receiving a notice of this action, and have the experience to help you deal with this in the best way possible for you. Attorney referrals accepted.

Antonelli Law can help you nationwide if you have received an ISP letter informing you a subpoena for your identity was received, or if you are served with a summons or waiver of service.

Antonelli Law is Very Experienced Defending BT Claims

Antonelli Law has represented nearly 2,000 clients dealing with copyright trolls and satellite piracy trolls. We have gained a great deal of insight into what works and what is a waste of your time and money. We have no desire to have you spin your wheels with legal work that does not advance your defense and only racks up lawyer fees. However, we are experienced litigators and are prepared to defend clients vigorously. Either way, we will never put our interests ahead of your own.

Hiring Antonelli Law Is No More Expensive than Hiring a Local Attorney in Your State 

Antonelli Law's numerous federal court admissions, local counsel affiliations, and the nature of federal lawsuits allow us to effectively and cost-consciously represent you in your copyright infringement defense, no matter which state you live in - and no more expensively than a local attorney. 

We are able to represent you in your federal case without being more expensive or more difficult to hire than hiring a local attorney because federal courts require attorneys to file their papers electronically, and often conduct hearings by telephone. This makes frequent trips to the courthouse unnecessary. Also, we do not charge for airline flights or flying travel charges. Clients pay only for the normal travel time to the courthouse any local attorney would charge. 

Finally, we have affiliated local counsel in many states who have earned our trust and can appear in court on an expedited basis when necessary. We will of course be in court personally when necessary such as non-routine hearings or a trial.

An Overview of BitTorrent Copyright Infringement

To get an overview of this type of litigation and what you might expect to experience, click here for Jeffrey Antonelli's article Torrent Wars, published by the Illinois State Bar Association's Intellectual Property section.

More Information

See our motions to quash page and give us a call to speak with an attorney about filing a motion to quash the subpoena your ISP received for your account information and name. 

See our should I settle? page if you are thinking about possibly settling and give us a call. 

Recent Press on Antonelli Law


Our Legal Services

We offer a reasonable Flat Fee for motions to quash, and helping you settle and remain anonymous in many cases; and reasonable fees for defending you if you are named as a defendant in a copyright infringement lawsuit such as the LHF Productions lawsuit. 

Selected severe financial hardship cases are handled on a reduced or pro bono basis. We accept attorney referrals and clients for California, Colorado, Utah, Arizona, Nevada, Texas, Illinois, Indiana, 
Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, New Jersey, New York, Florida, and other states' federal file-sharing cases. This is a swiftly changing area of law and we continually follow the latest developments. 

Antonelli Law Ltd. provides advice based on years of solid litigation experience representing consumers and businesses and concentrates in representing people accused of BitTorrent copyright infringement. You need serious legal advice for your copyright troll defense - not from a firm who can only try to negotiate a settlement but has little or no actual litigation experience. Our last complex trial involved computer firewalls, sophisticated commercial networks, and a Microsoft certified expert. We have the credentials to back up our advice and settlement postures, and the other side knows it.  

A copy of the LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does Complaint can be found here and is duplicated in the following cases:


District of Arizona
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-13 2:16-cv- 02911
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-10 2:16-cv- 02915
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 2:16-cv-02690
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 2:16-cv-02691
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 2:16-cv-02632
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 2:16-cv-02644
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-17 2:16-cv-02550
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-15 2:16-cv-02557
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-10 2:16-cv-01556
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 2:16-cv-01474
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 2:16-cv-01471
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-20 2:16-cv-01469
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-15 2:16-cv-01472
LHF Productions. Inc v. Does 1-29 2:16-cv-01199
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-18 2:16-cv-01200
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-22 2:16-cv-01196
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-12 2:16-cv-01198
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 2:16-cv-01194

District of California
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-02588
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-02451
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-02452
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-02288

LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-02145

LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-02143
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-02136
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-02132

LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-02131

LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-01157
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-01158
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-01035
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-01045
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-00999

District of Colorado
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe et al 1:16-cv-02496
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-10 1:16-cv-02456
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe et al 1:16-cv-02244
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-18 1:16-cv-02208

LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 1 et al 1:16-cv-02148
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-12 1:16-cv-01993
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-16 1:16-cv-01696
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 1 et al 1:16-cv-01916
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 1 et al 1:16-cv-01867
LHF Productions, Inc v.  Does 1-15 1:16-cv-01821
LHF Productions, Inc v. John Does 1:16-cv-01462
LHF Productions, Inc v. John Does 1:16-cv-01379
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-19 1:16-cv-01309
LHF Productions, Inc v. John Does 1:16-cv-01230
LHF Productions, Inc v. John Does 1:16-cv-01048

District of Connecticut
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-11 3:16-cv-01689
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-15 3:16-cv-01393

District of Florida
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 8:16-cv-02170
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 8:16-cv-02171
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 8:16-cv-02172
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 8:16-cv-02173
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 8:16-cv-02174


District of Hawaii

LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-10 1:16-cv-00437
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-15 1:16-cv-00438
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-13 1:16-cv-00439
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-16 1:16-cv-00190
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-10 1:16-cv-00191

Northern District of Illinois

On July 20, 2016 Northern District of Illinois federal judge Andrea Wood granted the request of LHF Productions, Inc. to issue subpoenas to Comcast Cable to reveal the names of its Illinois internet subscribers who allegedly downloaded the movie "London Has Fallen." Click here for the Order allowing ISP subpoenas issued by judge Andrea Wood in LHF Productions Inc v Does 1- 19 16-cv-06800.


LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-31 16-cv-10201
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-23 16-cv-10203

LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-10205

LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-21 16-cv-10207
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-10208
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-10209
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-34 16-cv-10212
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 16-cv-10215
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 16-cv-09325
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-09324
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-32 16-cv-09323
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-31 16-cv-09320
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-18 16-cv-09318
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-33 16-cv-09316
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-34 16-cv-09315
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-22 16-cv-09313
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-09312
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-35 16-cv-09310
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-34 16-cv-09309
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-32 16-cv-09308
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-09307
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-31 16-cv-09305
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-08403
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-23 16-cv-08408
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-08410
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-22 16-cv-08411
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-16 16-cv-08412
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-08413
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-08415
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 16-cv-08416
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-08417
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-23 16-cv-08419
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-34 16-cv-08422
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-07673
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-07674
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-33 16-cv-07675
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-31 16-cv-07676
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-32 16-cv-07677
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-07679
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-07680
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-07681
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-23 16-cv-07684
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-22 16-cv-07687
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-07690
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-06796

LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-06797
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-06798
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-06799
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-19 16-cv-06800
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-18 16-cv-06801
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-30 16-cv-06802
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-31 16-cv-06803

LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-06805

LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-06806

LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-39 16-cv-06808
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-22 16-cv-06811
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-30 16-cv-04730
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 16-cv-04731
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-04732
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-19 16-cv-04733
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-04734
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-23 16-cv-04740
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-04741
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-04742
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-04743
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-04744
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-03903

LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-03904
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-03892
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-21 16-cv-03902
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-03896
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-03899
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 16-cv-03907
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 16-cv-03897
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-31 16-cv-03905
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-03887
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-31 16-cv-10557
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-10561
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-10564
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-19 16-cv-10565
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-21 16-cv-10567
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-19 16-cv-10568
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-31 16-cv-10570
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-10571
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-32 16-cv-10575

District of Indiana:
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al (1-10) 2:17-cv-00231

District of Maryland
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1 et al 1:16-cv-02759
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-15 3:16-cv-01393

District of Minnesota
LHF Productions, Inc v. John and Jane Does 1
-15 1:16-cv-02950

District of Nevada

LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 2:16-cv-02375
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 2:16-cv-02368

LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 2:16-cv-02028

LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-18 2:16-cv-01918
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 2:16-cv-01803
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 2:16-cv-01804
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-11 2:16-cv-00924
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-14 2:16-cv-00925
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-30 2:16-cv-00926


Districts of North Carolina
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-5 1:17-cv-00151
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-9 5:17-cv-00284
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-11 5:17-cv-00283
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-10 5:16-cv-00739
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-10 1:16-cv-01050
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-9 5:16-cv-00149

District of New York

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1-15 1:17-cv-01530
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 1-8 1:16-cv-05449
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 1-15 1:16-cv-05450

LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 1:16-cv-04981

LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 1:16-cv-04917

LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-19 1:16-cv-02097
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-9 1:16-cv-02114
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-14 1:16-cv-03162

Northern District of Ohio
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-15 1:16-cv-1354

Southern District of Ohio
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-17 2:16-cv-0498


District of Oregon
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:17-cv-00242
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:17-cv-00241

LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:17-cv-00161

LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:17-cv-00160
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:17-cv-00159
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:17-cv-00155
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:17-cv-00154

LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-01747

LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-01524
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-01441
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 1:16-cv-01485
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-01000
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-00745
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-00746
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-00716
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-00717
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-00591

LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-00592
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-00594
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-00595

District of Eastern Pennsylvania
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Doe (1-12) 2:17-cv-00533

District of Utah
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-21 2:17-cv-00122 LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-23 2:17-cv-00104 LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-29 2:16-cv-01298 LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-30 2:17-cv-00103 LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-29 2:16-cv-01298 LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-18 2:16-cv-01297
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-24 2:17-cv-00017
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-29 2:16-cv-01298 LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-18 2:16-cv-01297
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-21 2:17-cv-00016
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-29 2:16-cv-01298
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-18 2:16-cv-01297
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-27 2:16-cv-01280

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-24 2:16-cv-01279

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-28 2:16-cv-01260

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-27 2:16-cv-01262

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-25 2:16-cv-01236

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-27 2:16-cv-01237
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-28 2:16-cv-01238

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-27 2:16-cv-01219
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-22 2:16-cv-01099
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-22 2:16-cv-01100
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 2:16-cv-01072
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 2:16-cv-01071

LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 2:16-cv-01007

District of Virginia

LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-10 3:16-cv-00748
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-10 5:16-cv-00030
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 3:16-cv-00283
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-20 3:16-cv-00284
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 3:16-cv-00282
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 5:16-cv-00027
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-18 3:16-cv-00274


District of Washington
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al (1-10) 2:1
7-cv-00254
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 2:16-cv-01
648
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 2:16-cv-01
588
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 2:16-cv-01
354
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 2:16-cv-01273
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 2:16-cv-01089
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 2:16-cv-01090
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 2:16-cv-01015
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al 2:16-cv-01017
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 1 et al 2:16-cv-00864
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 1 et al 2:16-cv-00865
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 1 et al 2:16-cv-00731
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 1-16 2:16-cv-00621
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 1-17 2:16-cv-00623
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 1-17 2:16-cv-00551
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 1-10 2:16-cv-00552


LHF Productions has filed lawsuits in Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Virginia,Utah, and Washington state. Attorneys representing LHF Productions, Inc. include

Jeffrey R. Schmieler, Michael Hierl, David J. Stephenson, Jr., Gregory Collins, KERCSMAR & FELTUS PLLC, Epstein Grangel, Todd E. Zenger, KIRTON McCONKIE






35 East Wacker Drive, Suite 1875
Chicago, IL 60601

Tel (312) 201-8310

Blogs

Torrent Defenders
There was an error retrieving your RSS feed

Antonelli Law Copyright Attorneys

Jeffrey Antonelli
Nationwide

Melissa Brabender
Nationwide
 


Byron Ames
Local Counsel for Nevada & Utah


Tristan Robinson
Local Counsel for Texas


Mark Del Bianco
Local Counsel for Maryland & DC


Leslie Farber
Local Counsel for NY, NJ, Pennsylvania


Peter Glazer
Local Counsel for Virginia
Website Builder