A recent article by The National Law Review covered a win for a defendant in a Strike 3 Holdings lawsuit. Defendants learn of these cases through a letter from their ISP and a subpoena from Strike 3 Holdings accusing them of copyright infringement. Whether the defendant is guilty or not, these cases can lead to major consequences including steep fines.

A loss for Strike 3 Holdings

A recent defendant was successful in court against Strike 3 Holdings. The National Law Review states “Recently, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of Judge Thomas S. Zilly of the District Court of the Western District of Washington in favor of defendant John Doe, a retired police officer accused of illegally downloading and distributing adult content produced by Strike 3 Holdings LLC. Agreeing with the district court’s finding that Strike 3 failed to prove its claim that the defendant pirated its adult films, the Court of Appeals upheld the lower court’s order requiring Strike 3 to pay defendant John Doe $47,777 in costs and fees.”

While this is good news for defendants in these cases, it has not slowed Strike 3 Holdings filings. Strike 3 has shown no signs of slowing down and defendants are certainly still at risk of being sued and facing serious consequences. If you or someone you know is a defendant in a Strike 3 Holdings case, contact an experienced attorney today.

How Antonelli Law can help resolve your Strike 3 Holdings case

Our attorneys have worked on hundreds of Strike 3 Holdings lawsuits and are ready to help you with yours. Defendants can choose to settle anonymously, fight their case in court, or file a motion to quash the case. We offer free consultations where we can discuss the specifics of your case and how we can help you find a resolution.

To schedule a consultation with Antonelli Law for free and discuss your Strike 3 Holdings lawsuit call 312-201-8310 or click here.

This is a blog dedicated to updates on copyright infringement cases. We’ve represented over 700 Strike 3 Holdings clients across the US since 2017, and are America’s most experienced BT copyright defense firm; we can represent you in your case. For more information about handling your subpoena visit our main website page for Strike 3 Holdings. 

Strike 3 Holdings has been filing copyright infringement lawsuits for years that have impacted thousands of defendants. These cases can lead to serious consequences including steep fines and settlement amounts. While defendants do have options in these cases, they can still leave defendants feeling scared and unsure of the future that lies ahead.

Strike 3 Holdings recent loss in Washington

Strike 3 Holdings recently filed an appeal in Seattle, Washington. The official document states:

“Strike 3 Holdings, LLC appeals the district court’s award of attorney’s fees in favor of John Doe on Doe’s counterclaim for non-infringement. Strike 3 argues that Doe lacked standing to pursue his counterclaim because Strike 3 voluntarily dismissed its copyright infringement claim against Doe and could not renew that claim in the future. Strike 3 also contends that the district court abused its discretion by awarding fees under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 505, because the fee award did not further the Act’s essential goals. The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.”

In these cases, “The party seeking declaratory relief must demonstrate (1) a concrete and imminent injury, (2) that is causally connected to the defendant’s actions, (3) which could be redressed by a favorable decision.” In this appeal, Strike 3 challenged the first two requirements that John Doe cannot demonstrate concrete and imminent injury. With the existence of pending litigation between Strike 3 and the defendant and a possibility of future litigation between the two, this “constitutes the type of injury that confers constitutional standing.”

Strike 3 had voluntarily dismissed it’s infringement claims against John Doe, but this meant Doe needed to decide whether to pursue his non-infringement counterclaim or surrender to the claim in the hope that Strike 3 would not bring further action based on Doe’s prior alleged infringement, “and And while Strike 3 enjoyed the “absolute right” to dismiss its infringement claim under Federal Rule Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), Am. Soccer Co., Inc. v. Score First Enters., 187 F.3d 1108, 1110 (9th Cir. 1999), it did not have the absolute right to choose the consequences of its without-prejudice dismissal.” John Doe’s fear of potential prosecution was concrete and imminent.  Additionally, Strike 3’s oral argument admitted that it was not clear whether the accused infringer was the father or son living in the household.

Ultimately the court ruled in Doe’s favor stating:

“The district court limited its analysis of the Fogerty factors to compensation and deterrence, ultimately concluding that compensating Doe for litigating a meritorious copyright defense sufficiently advanced the goals of the Copyright Act. We admit that the district court’s analysis of the Fogerty factors could have been more robust as it merely considered the factors it deemed relevant and applied them to this case. But the factors are, by definition, non-exclusive, Fogerty, 510 U.S. at 534 n.19, and the district court was not required to discuss each one in depth. Thus, we are not left with “a definite and firm conviction” that the district court erred. Wall Data Inc. v. Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Dept., 447 F.3d 769, 787 (9th Cir. 2006).”

Watch the video here:

What to do if you’re a target in a Strike 3 Holdings lawsuit

If you’re a target in a Strike 3 Holdings lawsuit, contact an attorney who is experienced with copyright infringement to discuss your options. The attorneys at Antonelli Law have handled thousands of copyright infringement cases and can represent clients across the nation. We offer free consultations and can discuss your options with you today.

To schedule a consultation with Antonelli Law for free and discuss your Strike 3 Holdings lawsuit call 312-201-8310 or click here.

This is a blog dedicated to updates on copyright infringement cases. We’ve represented over 700 Strike 3 Holdings clients across the US since 2017, and are America’s most experienced BT copyright defense firm; we can represent you in your case. For more information about handling your subpoena visit our main website page for Strike 3 Holdings. 

Strike 3 Holdings has accused thousands over the years of federal copyright infringement. They accuse defendants of illegally downloading their adult film content typically using file-sharing software such as BitTorrent. These cases can lead to serious consequences including steep fines that can leave defendants in financial ruin.

When you find out you’re being sued by Strike 3 Holdings, contact the attorneys at Antonelli Law to learn about your options and hear from an experienced team that’s ready to help you.

A competitive edge for your Strike 3 Holdings defense 

Jeffrey Antonelli is extremely experienced with Strike 3 Holdings lawsuits and the team at Antonelli Law has helped hundreds of Strike 3 Holdings defendants resolve their lawsuits. When you’re being sued by Strike 3 Holdings you want to ensure that the attorney representing you can give your defense an advantage. Antonelli is proud to be admitted to the  Federal Trial Bar in the Chicago federal court (NDIL), a competitive edge that most other attorneys do not have.

But what does this mean? 

This means that Antonelli is able to conduct a trial and witness testimonies at a hearing which can make your defense stronger and lead to a reduction in consequences that you may not have been able to receive without it.

The Trial Bar advantage in your Strike 3 Holdings lawsuit in Illinois

According to the Chicago Illinois federal court:

“Admission to the Northern District of Illinois District Court’s Trial Bar is a distinction of prestige and experience. The Trial Bar was created to raise the level of quality and professionalism at proceedings in the Northern District of Illinois. In order to appear as lead at testimonial proceedings in the Northern District of Illinois, an attorney must be a member of the Court’s Trial Bar.”

When you choose Antonelli Law to represent you, you can rest assured that a team of highly qualified attorneys are on your side. We’ll do everything we can to help you resolve your case and give you the best possible outcome.

To search for attorney federal court admission status in NDIL click here.

To schedule a free consultation with one of our experienced copyright infringement attorneys and learn more about your Strike 3 Holdings lawsuit call 312-210-8310 or click here.

 

A recent article in Torrent Freak dives into the recent court rulings affecting Strike 3 Holdings lawsuits. The article states

“A New Jersey district court has reversed a devastating order against Strike 3 Holdings, the most active copyright litigant in the US. A magistrate judge previously denied the company the right to subpoena ISPs because the underlying complaints are futile. While these subpoenas are now allowed, Strike 3 can’t initiate settlement discussions.”

What this means for Strike 3 Holdings

In October of 2019 a Judge denied Strike 3 Holdings expedited discovery in many of its cases stating that there were very few facts included in the complaints. However, that ruling was recently reversed by a New Jersey Judge allowing them to subpoena ISPs for personal data of defendants. While this seemed to be a positive for Strike 3 Holdings there was an important stipulation.

The Judge put protective measures into place to protect the anonymity and privacy of defendants. This protective order prohibits Strike 3 Holdings from making defendant’s personal data public. On top of this protective measure, the Judge also stated that Strike 3 Holdings is no longer allowed to propose settlements:

“Plaintiff is prohibited from initiating, directly or indirectly, any settlement communications with defendant (or any person associated with defendant or the IP address), unless (1) that party is represented by counsel and (2) their counsel initiates settlement discussions.”

About Strike 3 Holdings lawsuits

Strike 3 Holdings accuses defendants of illegally downloading their adult film content. Defendants have three options in these cases:

• Settle anonymously
• File a motion to quash
• Fight the case in court

These cases are time-sensitive and serious. If you’re a defendant in a Strike 3 Holdings lawsuit, don’t delay. Call an experienced copyright infringement attorney to discuss your options and learn more about your lawsuit.

To schedule a free consultation with one of our experienced copyright infringement attorneys and learn more about your Strike 3 Holdings lawsuit call 312-210-8310 or click here.

 

Are you being sued by Strike 3 Holdings and you’re not sure what to do next? Let the experienced attorneys at Antonelli Law help.

Step 1: Confirming your Strike 3 Holdings lawsuit is real

Whether you’ve heard of Strike 3 Holdings or not, you may not be sure if the lawsuit is real, but it’s important you don’t simply ignore it and hope it goes away. If you’ve received a letter from your internet service provider and a subpoena from Strike 3 Holdings, the lawsuit is 100% real and you’re being sued. They’re accusing you, or someone in your home or office, of illegally downloading their adult film content. Most defendants are accused of using file-sharing software to obtain the films, such as BitTorrent.

Step 2: Contact an experienced copyright infringement attorney

Once you’ve confirmed your lawsuit is real, it’s important to remain calm and contact an attorney. The attorneys at Antonelli Law are extremely experienced with copyright infringement cases and have worked on hundreds of cases involving Strike 3 Holdings. We can discuss your specific case in detail and then come up with a range of options in resolving your case.

Step 3: Come up with a plan to resolve your Strike 3 Holdings lawsuit

We will discuss settling your case anonymously, filing a motion to quash, and fighting your case in court. Settling tends to be the most popular option chosen by defendants but when you reach out to us for a free consultation we can discuss the benefits of each option and how they relate to your specific case. When you decide to work with Antonelli Law, we’ll fight tirelessly for you until your case is fully resolved and your life is back to normal.

To schedule your free consultation to discuss your lawsuit with Strike 3 Holdings with one of our attorneys call 312-201-8310 or click here.

This is a blog dedicated to updates on copyright infringement cases. We’ve represented over 400 Strike 3 Holdings clients across the US since 2017, and are America’s most experienced BT copyright defense firm; we can represent you in your case. For more information about handling your subpoena visit our main website page for Strike 3 Holdings.